The method can be harmless with no violence in it. It does not matter whether these methods are legal or illegal, fair or foul, kind or cruel, truth or lies, democratic or dictatorial, good or evil.
And they would pretend to like him, but continue secretly hating him in their hearts. They argue that it is for the common good of the public. According to them it is not only necessary that goal should be good but the means adopted for achieving it should also be good.
When peaceful requests and talk fail to bring about the desired result, they use sheer force to suppress such riots. An enterprise can succeed only if it has a goal. According to them it is not only necessary that goal should be good but the means adopted for achieving it should also be good.
If you do nothing and stick to your moral grounds, you will be destroyed, but the war will be over.
Imagine watching your greedy brother murder your very own father. Your end was getting a good mark on the test. Not a good way to go. They would say that the fact that they cured cancer made the loss of one life to save many worth it.
The proverb, a very disputable one, means that if the goal is good the methods adopted for achieving it do not matter. Sure, they did what they wanted to do, but the way they got there was not good at all.
If the means and goal both are noble the statement works and if any of these are immoral then any justification should nor work and should not be accepted. But what do you do when a country declares war against you?
According to him, it is justifiable to go to any extent for achieving a good cause. A person may be using noble ways to achieve noble ends, which is right in every sense.
It will be harmful to some people. Only the method of achieving it is different. Your answer evaluation happens on the basis of all these points and the overall score gets generated out of Justification for such were seen in Holocaust, bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
If you take up arms to defend yourself, you are violating your moral code for the sake of stopping the war.
When peaceful requests and talk fail to bring about the desired result, they use sheer force to suppress such riots. But all that can be justified if the goal is good. The End Justifies The Means. Some great Indian leaders and thinkers like Gandhi have opposed this doctrine. It may be necessary to use violence sometimes.
Some great Indian leaders and thinkers like Gandhi have opposed this doctrine. However, the problems arise when judging if it is worth it, and if the undesirable might be of potential value later. Such situations creates a difficult situation to work out these discussions. How did you reach that end?Nov 04, · In short, “the end justifies the means” means that if you have to use questionably bad (or in the case of science possibly, mad) “means” (actions, methods) to bring about a goal you consider unquestionably good at the end of it all (AKA, the “end”), then.
Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional academic writers. You can view samples of our professional work here. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and.
May 12, · It was Niccolo Machiavelli, a political thinker has a famous phrase "End Justifies means". This has become a debatable topic because there is a bad and a good side to this. A person may be using noble ways to achieve noble ends, which is right in every sense.
Save Essay ; View my Saved Essays ; Downloads: 28; Grade level: When does the End Justify the Means?.
At least at one point in our lives, each one of us has had to make a poor or dishonest decision. We may have even tried to justify our actions by twisting the truth or thinking that is was for the best in the end. The End Justifies the /5(3). Does the End Justify the Means Essay Lesley Rawlins The end justifies the means The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse distasteful and objectionable actions undertaken by its people.
In effect, the phrase is a justification for dispensing with all morality and principle in the passage. Does the popular saying, "The end justifies the means", apply to assassinations of undesirables? Add a New Topic; Add to My Favorites If we look at the history of assassinations that affected the world, we will see that the end does not justify the means.
Assassination in past history has resulted in more problems than before the.Download